Prompting Seedance 2.5 vs 2.0: what actually changed
2.5 is not a bigger leap than 2.0 was. It is a more reliable one. Here are the prompt habits that matter now, from moving our builders over.
2.5 is not a bigger leap than 2.0 was. It is a more reliable one. Here are the prompt habits that matter now, from moving our builders over.
We moved our Content creator builder from Seedance 2.0 to 2.5 this fall. The headline is not “better looking video”. It is that 2.5 does what you ask more often, which is what you want when you are making ads at volume.
Four prompt habits changed for us.
2.0 ignores timestamps and only follows shot numbers. 2.5 follows integer-second ranges. Keep them continuous, with no gaps, and size each range to what happens in it:
0s-3s: She holds the bottle up to the camera and says the first line. 3s-7s: She turns the label toward the lens and explains what changed. 7s-12s: Close on her face as she gives the last line.
Too little in a range and the model improvises. Too much and it cuts or drops lines. We split each script by its words, so every second has something to do. That alone fixed the dead air before the first word.
Say what each reference is and what to take from it: “the woman in Image 1, her face, outfit and room”. Never rely on the image to explain itself, and never put names inside the picture. That causes duplicated or swapped characters. 2.5 also accepts multi-view images of one subject, which 2.0 handled badly.
Write positive descriptions. Negatives only work for subtitles and audio, so the only “no” lines left in our prompts are “No subtitles” and “No BGM”.
For edits, lead with “Editing task:” and describe the change from A to B: “Replace the woman in Video 1 with the woman in Image 1.” Our Recast tool does exactly this on every run.
2.5 rewards a prompt written like a shot list: a one-line summary, the plot by the second, and what stays constant.
Kristian ResabalCo-founder, diffusrFind what’s selling in your category, then make your version in one shot.
A format is the part of a winning ad you can copy without copying the ad. Here is how we define one, and why we build everything around them.
The cheapest way to a lower CPA isn’t a new idea. It’s a winning ad with the parts swapped out.